Hunter Biden Lawyer Threatened To Put Joe Biden On The Stand

The Pro Trump News homepage has 60 new headlines every 24 hours - click here to see it.

More information has come out on how the Hunter Biden plea deal, which has now fallen apart, came to be.

According to a politico report Hunter Biden’s attorney Chris Clark threatened to put Joe Biden on the stand if he was charged by the DOJ.

ADVERTISEMENT

Politico reported:

It was Halloween of 2022, and Hunter Biden’s lawyer, Chris Clark, didn’t sound happy. Just three weeks earlier, news had leaked that federal agents believed they had enough evidence to charge his client with illegally buying a gun as a drug user.

The leak was “illegal,” the lawyer wrote to the U.S. attorney overseeing the probe. The prosecution, he argued, would be seen as purely political, and it might even violate the Second Amendment.

Then he issued a warning: If the Justice Department charged the president’s son, his lawyers would put the president on the witness stand.

That letter, along with more than 300 pages of previously unreported emails and documents exchanged between Hunter Biden’s legal team and prosecutors, sheds new light on the fraught negotiations that nearly produced a broad plea deal. That deal would have resolved Biden’s most pressing legal issues — the gun purchase and his failure to pay taxes for several years — and it also could have helped insulate Biden from future prosecution by a Republican-led Justice Department.

Hunter Biden’s lawyers were worried about the political atmosphere of the case.

New York Post reported:

In exchanges in the months prior, Clark and his team often told prosecutors during private negotiations that they were worried about the intense political atmosphere surrounding the case, according to Politico.

They raised concerns over pressure from Republican lawmakers and argued that the case could tarnish the DOJ’s reputation.

Clark said that trying the president’s son, pitting the president against his own Justice Department, would create constitutional chaos.

“This of all cases justifies neither the spectacle of a sitting President testifying at a criminal trial nor the potential for a resulting Constitutional crisis,” Clark wrote.



Advertisement